Worry About it Later

Election Vox Pop

2007-11-20T17:22:00.000+11:00

"I'll be voting for the ALP because I just think the Australian Liberal Party have more experience in managing the economy."

"I heard that 70% of Labor are in a trade union, so it kind of worries me that they might wreck the economy."

"I'll be voting Family First because I value my family, and I want to put them first. Except my second son whom I disowned because he's a faggot."

"I like the sound of Kevin Rudd's education revolution, but I'm concerned about Labor's ability to manage the economy. I'm worried that we'll end up with 70% interest rates again."

"I'm definately voting for the Greens because they're the only ones opposed to the Guns Mill in Tasmania and I'm worried that some of those guns will end up in our schools."

"I'll be voting Liberal because the Labor party have really stuffed up our hospitals and trains."

"I'm a swinging voter, but I think this time I'll be voting Labor because of the GST."

"I've decided to vote for the Democrats this election because I really like Al Gore."

"I think we need someone like Pauline Hanson as Prime Minister so I'll be voting for her. We have to protect our borders from terrorists and Aboriginals."

"I'll be voting Liberal because they're offering $3 billion more tax cuts than Labor."

"Well I've got $10 on a quinella of Howard for PM and Alan Jones for Wallabies coach, so you know who I'll be voting for."

Breaking News: Rudd Calls Election

2007-10-09T19:53:00.001+10:00

At 4pm EST Labor leader Kevin Rudd called a press conference at his at his Canberra residence to announce that he had visited the governor-general earlier in the day, and had decided that the time was right for an election to be called.

Mr Rudd told reporters that "this election will be about white pine blister rust. That is, any of several diseases of pines caused by rust fungi of the genus Cronartium and marked by destructive invasion of bark and sapwood and producing blisters externally. Who do you white pine blister rust to keep the economy on track? Who do you white pine blister rust to keep interest rates low?"

Joe Hockey, in a doorstep interview shortly after the announcement decried Mr Rudd's hubris in attempting to define the parameters of the election.

"The voters will decide what the election is about, and its about union bosses."

Garrett Endorses Pulp Mill

2007-10-09T19:50:00.000+10:00

Opposition Environment spokesperson Peter Garrett has come under fire from conservation groups and the Australian Greens for his decision to support the approval by Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull of a controversial pulp mill in Tasmania's pristine Tamar Valley.

"Yes, I was head of the Australian Conservation Foundation at one stage, but as we get older our opinions mature. I was just a hot-headed forty-something back then, but now I realise that sometimes conservation applies equally to your electoral standing."

Greens leader Bob Brown has accused Garrett of "selling out" on his principles, declaring that they could no longer be friends. Mr Garrett replied that Bob Brown was just jealous because he won't get to be environment minister, and also that he is gay. Mr Brown replied that Garrett has no hair. To which Mr Garrett replied that Brown wears stupid ugly cardigans.

The Arts Revue was Shit: Rudd

2007-10-09T19:45:00.000+10:00

Federal Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd last night described his disappointment at the quality of this year's Sydney University Arts Revue in a policy announcement released at midnight via the online video sharing site YouTube.

The prime minister today attempted to wedge Mr Rudd on this issue, saying that the Arts Revue was a proud aussie tradition, describing its actors as patriotic heroes and aspirational battlers who just needed a government who would keep the economy on track.

Mr Rudd today attempted to clarify his comments, pointing out that actually he thought that some of the sketches, especially the opening number, were really very funny, and that the bit in the middle where Sertan was dressed in military uniform and they all danced to that Edwin Starr song was hilarious.

"I also maintain a deep and mutual admiration and affection for the director. And the delusionists bits are still heaps funny."

Upon hearing that Kevin Rudd had said something, Alexander Downer called a snap press conference, telling reporters that Mr Rudd was only being a clever politician, knowing that this issue would get him at least 27 comments on his blog.

Joe Hockey blamed union bosses.

Rudd Might Oppose Death Penalty

2007-10-09T19:42:00.000+10:00

Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd today chastised his own foreign affairs spokesman, describing a speech by Robert McClelland in which he signals Labor's disaproval of capital punishment for the Bali bombers as "insensitive".

McClelland had been trying to make the point that Australia's clemency pleas for its own citizens on death-row can be dismissed as hypocritical by other nations, who might point to the comments of Australia's own prime minister in support of the execution of the Bali bombers. He today apologised for his hurtful comments, dismissing the argument as "absurd" and apologising to the prime minister for any injury to his feelings.

Kevin Rudd attempted to hose down the issue by declaring that "whilst the prime minister and I agree on a lot of things, this is one issue where I must say that we are in particular harmony and resounding agreement that we are absolutely opposed to the death penalty, but believe that it is wrong not to kill terrorists."

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer called a press conference immediately following Mr Rudd's remarks, accusing the Opposition Leader of being a "clever politician".

"Kevin Rudd is a clever politician, and a clever opposition leader. You may recall that I was once an opposition leader, but you never saw me being clever. I have never been a clever politician. I have never been a clever Foreign Affairs Minister. In fact I can categorically declare that I have never been very clever at all."

Workchoices Tops Ratings Again

2007-10-09T19:32:00.000+10:00

In another coup for the high flying Howard government, the latest ACNielsen poll reveals that this week's episode of its new comedy series Workplace Relations has continued its successful debut season by outrating its nearest rivals, Seven's Border Security and Ten's Thank God You're Here by over 200,000 viewers.

Industry insiders credit the success of the show to its wacky characters, zany plotlines, and the hilarious antics of the show's main character 'Kerry', a call-centre operator harbouring a secret dream of Broadway stardom. The unnamed characters known only to fans as 'those two dumb drunk blokes' have also become a cult favourite amongst devotees of the series, with their catchphrases 'aahyeeah', and 'riiiight' now entrenched in pop-culture lexicon.

Fans can't seem to get enough of the surprise hit of the spring. One fan of the show identifying himself as 'Steve82' wrote on a television discussion website that 'Workplaces Relations is way better than The Simpsons. But only because I've seen every episode of The Simpsons over 430 times, but I've only seen most episodes of Workplace Relations about 350 times.'

Industry experts have credited much of the success of Workplace Relations to the advertising blitz employed by the show's producers, with radio, newspaper, internet, billboard, cinema, direct mail and rest room advertising bombarding the public with images and previews of the show.

Earlier in the year the show was embroiled in controversy when one of its stars was shown to be playing a different character to his actual character in real life.

2007-10-04T18:16:00.001+10:00

2007-09-30T14:24:00.000+10:00

Say no to animationism.

2007-09-20T17:56:00.001+10:00

2007-09-18T18:43:00.001+10:00

2007-09-03T18:20:00.000+10:00

2007-09-02T23:32:00.000+10:00

EXTREME!!!

( click to enlarge )

2007-08-23T17:46:00.000+10:00

2007-08-21T17:48:00.000+10:00

2007-08-20T15:32:00.000+10:00

Everybody go see the Women's Revue. It will be hilarious, fantastic and generally awesome, and the organisers have promised minimal bloodshed. Unless you heckle.

2007-08-17T14:12:00.001+10:00

First person to decode the binary gets a free beer.

2007-08-14T13:57:00.001+10:00

2007-08-09T18:51:00.001+10:00

So basically Max, yeah, it is funny.

2007-08-06T17:53:00.000+10:00

Okay, there's a strong possibility that most of you aren't going to get this. Whilst explaining a joke invariably denudes it of all humour, you'll still get a kick out of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbGkxcY7YFU

2007-08-01T18:18:00.001+10:00

Nobody dies in the next strip. I promise.

2007-07-31T18:17:00.002+10:00

Honi what?

2007-07-24T18:05:00.000+10:00

Everyone hates competent people.

( Click to enlarge )

2007-07-23T17:26:00.001+10:00

2007-07-20T13:31:00.001+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

Editorial: Reckless Sim Card Providers

2007-07-19T18:18:00.000+10:00

He may not have known that the sim card would be used in a terrorist act, but Mohamed Haneef didn't bother to ask, and we here at The Daily Worry believe that this makes his actions reckless.

Philip Ruddock yesterday canvassed a list of proposed amendments to anti-terror legislation, declaring that the current laws, whilst being a vast improvement over our previous rights-based system of law, still needed some fine-tuning.

The Daily Worry applauds Mr Ruddock for having the courage to push forward with these desperately needed reforms, including the following new laws:

Recklessly serving coffee to a potential terrorist.

Recklessly providing street directions to a muslim.

Providing comfort to a suspected terrorist through sexual intercourse.

Providing a hair cut to a suspected terrorist.

Viewing or distributing material likely to promote Al Jazeera.

Recklessly failing to purchase a return ticket.

Parking in a disabled zone.

Recklessly providing an interview to Lateline.

Performing emergency surgery on a suspected terrorist.

Recklessly chatting up a lady in a hijab.

Recklessly leaking material to a media outlet in a manner likely to cause embarassment.

Recklessly providing an interview to a biographer.

Recklessly defending a suspected terrorist in a court of law.

Negligently failing to display a fridge magnet.

Reckless indifference to government propaganda.

2007-07-18T12:46:00.001+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

2007-07-17T18:06:00.001+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

2007-07-16T18:00:00.000+10:00

Where's Iemma?

2007-07-13T13:20:00.000+10:00

2007-07-12T17:54:00.000+10:00

Darn you to heck naysayers!

2007-07-12T11:30:00.000+10:00

lol.

Exclusive Leak: ACTU Dirty Tricks Manual

2007-07-05T15:07:00.000+10:00

ACTU Dirty Tricks Manual

Author:
Date:
Revision:

Congratulations on your appointment to the position of: Union Apparatchik.

In your new role you will be expected to keep friendly tabs on your fellow union members and disseminate vital propaganda to the rank and file. This manual sets out a few helpful tips for ensuring that all members tow the party line at the coming election.

The Initial Call

The purpose of the initial call is to establish a rapport with the individual union member. Try to personalise the issues, finding out as much as you can about the member's family and other important circumstances. These details should be recorded for later use. Avoid mentioning anything which might imply the possibility of life after government re-election. Leave the union member with a friendly goodbye and a cheery zeugmatic cliche such as 'remember to vote for Kevin Rudd and your children's future!'

The Follow-Up Call

The follow-up call is very important. It reminds the union member of the things they learnt in the initial call and can help them to understand that their union cares about them and their individual needs. Remember to use the information and rapport constructed during the initial call to your advantage. Enquire as to the health of their family and appear delighted when the member responds that their family is in good health.

The Follow-Up Follow-Up Call

If after the first two calls you are not entirely convinced that the member fully understands the consequences of a voting mishap, you might like to try a third call. In the course of this call you should remind the member of everything that the union has done for them, and how that might be taken away from them. Enquire as to the health of their family.

The Home Visit

The home visit will be necessary where three phonecalls have not resulted in a satisfactory assurance of compliance with union political policy. Tap on the door and inform the union member that their friendly union representative has come to pay them a visit. You should ask to meet the member's family and mention that you are delighted to finally meet them, reminding the member that you already know a lot about them. Once again, you should try to personalise the issues when discussing the new workplace laws and remember to leave pamphlets and stickers.

The Home Surveillance

After visiting the union member, you may have some nagging doubts as to their loyalty. Don't worry, these fears can be assuaged with some simple home surveillance. You should observe all comings and goings from the house and if possible get in contact with a union member at Telstra who can organise a phone tap. Remember to wear camouflage if hiding in bushes.

The Home Invasion

Sometimes surveillance can uncover some unpleasant truths about a member. Before reporting these details to your local politburo, you should obtain all necessary evidence to prove the member's disloyalty. Whilst the member and their family are out, break in to their home and take what you need. But remember, no fingerprints!

Blackmail

Having proven a member's disloyalty, you should give them a friendly chance to make amends for their foolish and selfish behaviour. Please ensure that you remain calm and do not resort to shouting or swearing during this process, as you can't be sure that the scene will not be recorded and released to the media. In a neutral and non-combative tone, inform the member that their family's safety can no longer be guaranteed.

Black Magic

Being that we are a union, we have all the forces of evil on our side. Dark Wizards can be organised at 24 hours notice - simply call your team leader at head office on 1300 375 926 between 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday.

The Gulags

It is unfortunate that some members continue to resist the revolution. Such betrayal must not of course, go unpunished. Teams of Blackshirts operate routes in your area Monday through Saturday, 11pm-5am. To have your member placed on a list of pickups simply call head office on 1300 375 926 and press #2 at the prompt to access our 24 hour automated service.

A bit little, click on it to view full screen

2007-07-04T18:10:00.001+10:00

NB - Piers Ackerman actually said and believes these things:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/opinion/story/0,22049,22004247-5001031,00.html

2007-07-04T18:06:00.001+10:00

Here comes trouble...

( Click to enlarge )

2007-07-03T13:38:00.001+10:00

More free publicity for Dan f*#%ing Brown.

( Click to enlarge )

2007-06-27T18:03:00.000+10:00

(Click to enlarge )

2007-06-22T17:27:00.001+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

2007-06-21T17:33:00.001+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

2007-06-19T18:08:00.001+10:00

2007-06-19T18:05:00.000+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

2007-06-13T17:31:00.000+10:00

(Click to enlarge)

Strategy

2007-06-13T12:56:00.000+10:00

( Click to enlarge )

We report. We decide.

2007-05-16T00:52:00.000+10:00

With the federal election just months away its time for us all to begin considering who we plan to reward with our vote. To make things a little simpler The Daily Worry’s chief political correspondent has prepared a set of fair and balanced appraisals to help specific groups of voters determine the party which best meets their peculiar needs.

Battlers & Mortgagors

All things considered, it is definitely in your best interests to vote for John Howard. The undeniable truth is that interest rates will always be lower under a Liberal than a Labor government. This natural law is actually the key element in Stephen Hawking's resolved theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. So except for that one time when John Howard was treasurer in 1982 and they hit 21.4%, apart from that one time, second place goes to the Hawke government with a whopping 19.55%. These are the exact same interest rates you'll end up with again if you vote for Labor. So even though interest rates have risen four times since the last election, and six times in a row, that's nothing compared to the sixty times you could expect under Labor. Interest rates currently stand at a low 6.25%. According to the Reserve Bank's historical interest rates webpage, when Paul Keating handed power over to John Howard in 1996, interest rates stood at 7.5% - this is of course a typographical error. They must have meant 75%.

The reasons behind these damning numbers are complex, but essentially boil down to Labor's lack of fiscal intelligence. The story of young Peter has long been a favourite yarn between comrades in the Canberra press gallery. The tale goes that as a young child, whenever Peter Costello was given a dollar to purchase a pint of milk for the family, he'd cleverly purchase a half-pint instead, thus being able to return fifty cents to his mother, who was always thrilled at the unexpected bonus. 'Such fiscal intelligence, you'll make a fine treasurer one day' she'd tell the delighted little boy. The advantage of having Peter in the house was that when the milk ran out, there would always be some spare money for his mother to go to the shops and purchase more. Wayne Swan on the other hand grew up in a lactose-intolerant family. He had a nasty habit of stealing a dollar from his mother's purse to buy milk that the family didn't even want.

So if interest rates concern you, vote for John Howard. It is a little known fact that in gratitude for enabling him to solve the biggest conundrum in physics, Stephen Hawking prepared for our great leader a mathematical formula of such genius that it allows him to deliver unlimited tax cuts without ever putting inflationary pressure on the economy. This is a secret formula which Labor does not have.

Families

If Labor is elected to power the deputy prime minister of Australia will be a woman by the name of Julia Gillard. Ms Gillard has chosen not to have children, so there is a good chance that she hates families. This sentiment is clearly shared by the alternative prime minister Kevin Rudd, who recently ran out on his own Sunrise family.

Since you are in the unique position of being in a family, you might want to consider voting Family First. But of course, your preference vote is always important when voting for a minor party, so on balance I'm going to recommend the Liberal party, for the following reasons:

1) John Howard doesn't hate families.

2) WorkChoices is a revelation for families. Statistics show that an enormous number of marriages break down after retirement. WorkChoices allows for greater flexibility in determining overlapping hours of employment, because the family that doesn’t spend the day together, stays together.

The Unemployed

This should not be a difficult choice. Thanks to the introduction of WorkChoices, Australia is enjoying its lowest unemployment figures since 4000BC. It is now easier than ever for you to walk into an interview and negotiate an attractive slave-wage and magnanimous trade-in on that battered set of conditions you no longer need. John Howard is your choice. Still not convinced? You're obviously not thinking straight because you couldn't afford breakfast this morning.

The Young

Without the distraction of all those well-funded university societies and clubs you’ve been wasting your time with, you've probably got a lot more time on your hands to think about just how much John Howard has done for you. If your parents are wealthy enough to fund you, you probably realised it a long time ago. But for the rest of you juggling study with four shifts a week at the local bottle shop, you'll eventually come around now that those pesky unions aren’t around to shout lies in your face all day. So don’t buy into this ‘education revolution’ rubbish – the revolution has already happened, and you totally won.

Single Mothers

You got your baby bonus. Now say thankyou. You are however, probably slightly concerned about the zero availability of affordable daycare. Well don't worry, the government has a plan to tackle the situation and get you back into the workforce. Its called kindergarten, and it kicks in when your child turns six.

Environmentalists

As the Prime Minister recently pointed out, the key to environmental protection is a strong economy. But of course you can't have a strong economy if you're going to go creating new green-power industries and a significant export market for new environmentally sound products. Labor wants to introduce a bunch of wacky environmental schemes that would wreck the economy and ergo destroy the environment. If you love the environment, vote clean, vote green, vote Liberal.

The Elderly

John Howard is probably older than you. If you don't think that makes him qualified to represent you you're almost certainly too senile to be reading this anyway.

Teachers

This is a tough choice. On the one hand you could vote for the party that isn't constantly using you as a political punching bag, but on the other hand you should vote Liberal.

Those with a mental or other disability (and their carers)

Umm, this is a state issue.

Small Business Owners

The latest CCH GST manual is now available in four convenient binders. Fortunately, if all this reading gets too frustrating you can always take your anger out on some unsuspecting and dispensable employee by firing him for whatever reason you damn well like. Go on, give it a try, its very therapeutic. Now thank the Laird.

The Wealthy

Until recently, life was hell for those earning over $150,000 per annum. Fortunately the government is set to raise the top tax threshold to $180,000, finally allowing you the breathing room you need to add that fourth storey to the holiday home.

Communists, trade unionists and anyone else who hates freedom

You might consider changing your vote to Liberal this election.

An Interview with Kevin Rudd

2007-05-09T15:31:00.000+10:00

Kevin Rudd (KR): Kevin Rudd, thanks for joining us tonight.

KR: Always a pleasure Kevin.

KR: I'll start with the first rhetorical question that you wish someone would ask you, does this budget fulfil the 'future test'?

KR: No it doesn't.

KR: Is that because it fails to address the need for an 'education revolution'?

KR: Absolutely. This budget does nothing to address the need for vast improvements in primary education or training, and goes only a small way to undoing eleven years of damage to universities under the Howard government. I mean, you've got to remember that John Howard is the same bloke who hates students.

KR: Does this budget do anything about our dire need for improved broadband infrastructure?

KR: Certainly not. Not one cent of this budget has addressed our life-threatening lack of fast broadband. Without investment in this area Australia risks being left in the dark ages, and by dark ages I mean 1024kbps ADSL, and by 1024kbps ADSL I mean death by lethal injection.

KR: And does this budget also fail the future test because it places inflationary pressure on the economy, thus increasing the likelihood of interest rate rises?

KR: Yes. All this election pork-barrelling will throw vast amounts of money into the economy, its just tricky politicking and economically irresponsible bribery. I must say, you're really asking the tough questions tonight Kevin.

KR: Does Labor support the tax cuts contained in this budget?

KR: Yes, its about time working families got a tax break, for the fifth year in a row. We wholeheartedly support these tax cuts.

KR: Some might say that tax cuts will only further inflationary pressure on the economy. Is that true?

KR: Well look, Mr Howard knows he's playing political games with the future of working families, but if I could just take the opportunity to use wild hand gestures to answer this question, our nation is being *thrust* into a world economy demanding *ingenuity* and *innovation*. Labor won't just *stand* by whilst Mr Howard *robs* us of our rightful *prosperity*, because the mining *boom* won't last *forever*.

KR: And what about climate change?

KR: Obviously its too little, too late. Mr Howard is just being clever and cunning and lots of other focus-group approved buzzwords. There has been nothing in this government's last eleven budgets to address climate change, but there might maybe have been something in Labor's last eleven budget replies somewhere, perhaps, maybe. But now we've got this measley $150 million pledge. Its clear that Mr Howard has been asleep at the wheel and is just trying to buy his way out in an election year. *Education revolution*.

KR: Education revolution?

KR: Yes.

KR: And just quickly with our last rhetorical question since we're running out of time, is it moral for the government to spend $60 million of taxpayer's money on WorkChoices advertising?

KR: Of course not. In fact its the exact opposite of moral. Its *immoral*.

KR: Kevin Rudd, we're out of time.

KR: Thanks Kevin.

Murdoch link to campus killer Cho

2007-04-20T12:46:00.000+10:00

Breaking News

Yesterday The Daily Telegraph published the following article: Iraq link to campus killer Cho.

Reports are now filtering in that police have arrested Rupert Murdoch, majority owner of News Corporation, publishers of The Daily Telegraph, over his links to the Virginia Tech gunman and any role he might have played in the massacre.

There is also speculation that since the gunman was Korean, Kim Jong Il might have been involved. The United States is currently considering a retaliatory strike against North Korea's closest ally China.

The NRA Plan for World Peace

2007-04-19T14:21:00.000+10:00

The man who sold Cho Seung-hui a gun which was later used to massacre thirty-two students at Virginia Tech has told reporters that he wished that students were allowed to carry firearms to class as this would have made the campus safer.

Virginia appears to have some of the most wonderfully freedom-loving gun laws in the world - anyone over 18 can purchase an assault weapon, children can be given guns from age 12 without parental consent, owners are free to carry loaded, concealed handguns in public, no license is required, no child safety-locking device is required to be sold with a gun, there is no 'cooling off' period after a firearm purchase, there is no requirement to register firearms, and strangely, guns sold at gun-shows are sold without background checks.

The lone gun-control law on the books in Virginia seems to be that students may not take firearms to class. Now John Markell, owner of the gun shop where Cho Seung-hui purchased one of the guns used to commit wholesale murder, is blaming that law for the massacre. Because schools would be a lot safer if everybody was carrying guns. Then people wouldn't get shot. Yes, that's the idea, and if you follow the logic it all makes perfect sense. We all need guns to protect ourselves from people with guns. You can't take all the guns away because people have a right to protect themselves from people with guns. And people who sell guns to murderers have no blood on their hands, its all the fault of that damn pesky legislature for stopping the victims from carrying guns. In fact, if every student were required to wear kevlar body armour to class, and store an AK-47 in their locker, none of this would have happened because everyone would just calmly talk over their differences before reaching a mutually agreeable compromise.

So the bottom line is, guns don't kill people, gun-control laws kill people. I've never really felt safe walking down the street at night in Sydney knowing that I don't have a gun to protect myself from all the people around me who don't have guns. So instead of going to all the effort of preventing Iran from building nuclear weapons, why don't we just give nuclear weapons to every nation on earth? Brilliant!

Exclusive: Labor Party Producing Generation of Slave-Drones

2007-04-18T18:59:00.000+10:00

New Opposition education spokesperson Andrew Stoner's first public act in the job has been to attack the Teachers Federation for their attempts to "brainwash" students through the display in public schools of advertising posters for Sunday's Rockin' For Rights concert in Sydney. The concert aims to protest the Federal government's industrial relations reforms, and says Stoner, "It's brainwashing kids to Labor's own political agenda."

Stoner went on to explain that politics has no place in public schools, and that if parents wanted their children exposed to political agendas they were free to pay thousands in fees at exclusive private schools, and that any Liberal government would be happy to subsidise this choice.

Other Opposition MPs joined the chorus of discontent, one explaining to The Daily Worry that "it is not the role of teachers to politicise issues, but to present the facts in a fair and impartial manner. So for example a teacher could explain to their students that the new laws will result in the teacher being paid less and the students having to accept low wages without any benefits or protections when they take up their first job, but that this is not necessarily a bad thing."

Malcolm Greenwood of the NSW Young Liberals told The Daily Worry that in the interests of fairness, teachers should explain to students the flip-side of union arguments - "that any superficially negative outcomes are balanced against the new ability for wealthy skilled workers to negotiate even more money, and that the peace of mind afforded business in knowing that it can sack people for no reason means that unemployment can be reduced through the creation of even more low-wage unprotected jobs. Which in turn means less dole-bludgers, and that's something we can all support."

Federal MPs were also outraged, one Liberal backbencher complaining to The Daily Worry that union advertising has always glossed over the fact that lower wages result in greater employment and lower inflation - "just look at China for example. Nearly anyone can get a job. Multi-national corporations like Nike are absolutely clamouring to do business there, and the Yuan is going gangbusters. Do we really want to be left behind?"

The Teachers Federation declined our request for comment, explaining that all delegates were currently on smoko.

Sunrise Family Split: Joe forbidden to play with Kevin

2007-04-16T18:18:00.000+10:00

The Sunrise family is in mourning today after two of its favourite sons announced their decision to call an end to their regular Friday morning superciliousness contest.

Channel 7 spokesperson Andrew Douglas has told The Daily Worry that recent advertisements boasting that 'whatever office they hold' the pair would continue to make time for Mel and Koschie, are expected to be modified to include a brief disclaimer.

It is understood that Joe Hockey is in trouble with his colleagues, and possibly his mum and dad, for being friends with 'that no-good Kevin boy'. Hockey publicly defended the Opposition Leader's mismanagement of the recent 'Sun Lies' debacle, in which Rudd was complicit in the Seven Network's plan to exploit untested and potentially dangerous theories of quantum physics to move dawn forward up to two hours in Southeast Asia to accommodate the higher ratings period during their proposed ANZAC Vietnam memorial service.

Asked by Laurie Oakes on Nine's Sunday program whether he would like to take the opportunity to make the other kids like him again by saying mean things about Kevin Rudd and the Seven Network, Hockey was quick to declare "I am part of the Sunrise family and each Friday morning we speak to nearly half a million Australians and that's very important and it is a very important way of communicating with people. But I think this has taken on a new level and there are a whole lot of questions that need to be answered by Mr Rudd."

Whilst that answer seems to have saved Hockey from six of the best from Old Man Howard, who was unable to effectively attack Rudd following his minister's gushing declaration of man-love, it was not enough for Oakes, who wanted Hockey to publicly disavow his Sunrise family on air. Hockey's refusal to do so angered Oakes, who at one point looked like he might eat Hockey, or at least have him cryogenically frozen for later.

Kevin Rudd's office has issued a statement saying that the Sunrise family had split due to 'creative differences'. The statement went on to explain that Kevin and Joe were heading 'in different directions' with Kevin pursuing a solo career as Prime Minister and Joe a rewarding position as a Shadow Minister for who-gives-a-shit.

Alan Jones: A Parroty of Himself

2007-04-12T18:32:00.000+10:00

With Media Watch's defecatory brush of liberal bias currently distracted by bigger issues, such as polar bears and underexposed photographs, the task of keeping the public informed about Alan Jones' recent tumults has fallen upon The Daily Worry.

Now, we're not suggesting that Alan Jones is a racist, mealy-mouthed, divisive, narcissistic, hypocritical, public toilet frequenting closet homosexual man-parrot - we'll leave that to Chris Masters. We are merely imploring the hero of the masses to accept due credit for his heroic deeds in the week leading up to the 2005 Cronulla Revolution.

This week the Australian Communications and Media Authority found Jones guilty of having made comments on his 2GB breakfast radio program between December 5-9 which were "likely to encourage violence or brutality and to vilify people of Lebanese and Middle-Eastern backgrounds on the basis of ethnicity".

Jones responded to the finding on air thusly - "To be charged with all of this is just unbelievable, especially when you've mounted the defences, and these were our defences, and at the end of the day, they didn't want to know about the defences". Yes Alan, we agree. It is disgraceful that one should be found guilty despite having gone to all the effort of mounting a defence.

Jones must come to recognise that whilst the people love him, those with power despise him. Except of course for our beloved and noble Prime Minister, who was quick to announce "I am not going to get involved in comments on individual decisions" before going on to involve himself in ACMA's decision by declaring "I don't think he's a person who encourages prejudice in the Australian community, not for one moment, but he is a person who articulates what a lot of people think".

How true. A lot of people thought that a violent alcohol-fuelled riot would be the best way of resolving the complex issues of increasing cultural tension. By the Thursday before the riot Jones was demanding tribute as the leader of the Revolution - "I'm the person that's led this charge here. Nobody wanted to know about North Cronulla, now it's gathered to this."

Yet now, the modest hero denies all - "Anyone who knows me knows I've never encouraged violence or brutality in anything ... and I did the exact opposite but our defences counted for nothing."

When a certain caller, identified only as John, called on the Tuesday of that hallowed week, he passed unto Alan Jones' listeners a fragment of wisdom for the ages. "Shoot one, the rest will run" he promised. Did Alan Jones then do the exact opposite of encouraging violence and brutality as he now humbly claims? No readers, verily unto you I say that Jones laughed heartily before replying "No, you don't play Queensberry's rules. Good on you John."

Alan Jones. Humble servant of the Revolution.

World Exclusive: Somebody's Holiday Snaps

2007-04-04T00:32:00.000+10:00

Banaue, Philippines.

(Above) Traditional Malaysian dance.

Readers Shocked: Blogger Apologises for Lack of Recent Entries

2007-04-03T14:25:00.000+10:00

In a stunning move that has sent shockwaves through the blogosphere, the editor of the much maligned publication Worry About it Later has issued a public apology for his lack of recent updates.

The apology has been met with mixed responses. Abigail West of Readers for Justice expressed delight - "finally, after all these weeks the fight is over. All we wanted was some recognition, an acknowledgement from the publication of the pain their lack of updates has caused. For days upon days we were left in the dark, with no idea what was really happening in the state election, or whether Brian Burke would make a good punchline to a faux-intellectual satirical piece. It was painful, but today we achieved justice."

Not everybody is satisfied however. Harold Blake, spokesperson for the NSW Victims of Crime organisation told The Daily Worry "this apology is completely meaningless and totally disingenuous. If this is all a blogger has to do to escape their obligations these days we're going to see a spate of these cases over the next few years. The government needs to make a stand against these types of breaches of trust right now."

Analyst Robin Stevens has refuted these suggestions, proposing that "bloggers are responsible people like you and me. These new laws give bloggers the freedom to choose when and how they operate their blogs and allow for more effective negotiations between bloggers and readers. Its all about flexibility and choice, which is why we've named these laws BlogChoices."

Research conducted by The Daily Worry's work experience student shows that this is only the third time since the invention of email that a blogger has admitted liability for a lack of posts and issued an apology for excessive delays. The editor claims he spent several days in rehab in the Philippines and has issued photographic evidence. Critics have suggested however that he also spent time catching up with friends in Malaysia, citing leaked photos as proof.

Next Issue: Evidence - the photographs that will shock you!

McKew to Challenge PM: ABC faces further cuts

2007-02-26T19:20:00.000+11:00

Yesterday's announcement that former ABC journalist Maxine McKew will stand for Labor preselection in the NSW seat of Bennelong, prime minister John Howard's electorate, has sparked outrage among senior Liberals, who had hoped nobody would notice the large number of recently married male doctors in the area.

Whilst Mr Howard himself remains tight-lipped about the challenge, Senator Helen Coonan has already begun firing ABC boardmembers.

"For over ten years now this government has been the sole source of funding to the ABC, and look how they repay us" said one senior Liberal. "It's scandalous, really bloody disgraceful what's going on here. All these years of interviewing Liberal politicians and claiming to be unbiased - the public should feel betrayed. This explains why she wasted so much of our time with those really annoying questions about refugees and stuff."

Liberal Party strategist Clayton Roby was similarly disgusted, telling The Daily Worry that it was the role of the ABC to remain unbiased against the government - "look, you don't see A Current Affair attacking James Packer do you? The ABC has become a breeding ground for anti-conservative hacks. I've always had my suspicions about Kerry O'Brien, and that Tony Jones is just a nightmare. The public is demanding action."

Asked what the Liberal Party planned to do about the anti-government culture at the ABC, one junior minister explained that the government had a plan to increase the efficiency of the ABC by decentralising its operations and outsourcing them to existing providers - "it's basically a rehash of the Job Network scheme, except Kevin Rudd's wife can't get rich off this one."

Debnam's Fury: Small Penises Not Funny

2007-02-23T18:29:00.000+11:00

Sources close to Peter Debnam have today revealed details of the NSW Opposition Leader's outrage upon hearing of a lewd text message sent by Brenton Pavier, the now disendorsed Liberal candidate for the Central Coast seat of Wyong.

A staffer in Mr Debnam's office has told The Daily Worry that the Liberal leader began frothing at the mouth shortly after reading a transcript of the offensive sms, and started choking on his own bile to such an extent that an ambulance was nearly called.

The message is reported to read "The video you have ordered about how to have sex with men with small penises is ready for collection and the DVD titled Anal Sex with Goats is overdue."

Mr Debnam last night issued a statement saying that although the sms was intended to be hilarious, it was in fact not funny at all because having sex with men with small penises is the same as having sex with a man with a larger penis, and just as satisfying - "in fact, often less painful for the woman."

Critic's say the Opposition Leader's endorsement contract with swimwear giant Speedo has created a conflict of interest.

The Great Debate

2007-02-19T13:08:00.000+11:00

In a thrilling televised debate on Friday, the articulate NSW Premier Morris Iemma went toe to toe with visionary Opposition Leader Peter Debnam. Through the course of the hard fought and often heated debate, Debnam was able to successfully convey his message that he would cut 20,000 public sector jobs in order to fund his many election promises. Premier Morris Iemma was able to contend with equal vigour however that Debnam would cut 20,000 public sector jobs in order to fund his many election promises. After the debate the Worry Poll found Quentin Dempster leading as preferred Premier, closely followed by Noni Hazelhurst.

Oakes still hates Latham

2007-02-17T10:34:00.000+11:00

Laurie Oakes confirmed in this week's edition of The Bulletin that contrary to recent speculation, he does in fact still hate Mark Latham for calling him fat. The Daily Worry has obtained an exclusive extract of the article titled 'Surge of Blood to the Head'. The article's header features a treat for fans - a brand-new picture of Oakes smirking, this time from the right side of his mouth.

"John Howard has been as reckless as Mark Latham. His attack on Democratic US presidential hopeful Barack Obama is comparable with Latham's bagging of George W. Bush. Not as crude, of course... But Howard is prime minister, with the kind of responsibilities Latham - thank God - never had."

By God, you know you've stuffed up when Laurie Oakes compares you to Mark Latham.

Journalist Uncovers Global Warming Conspiracy

2007-02-16T18:20:00.000+11:00

The Daily Worry can report that Sun-Herald journalist Miranda Devine is the early favourite for this year's Gold Walkley award after uncovering a vast international conspiracy over global warming.

In her brilliantly constructed article, Devine first demonstrates Labor's response to the issue to be little more than "hyperbolic scaremongering" on the basis that their proposed response would 'wreck the economy' and cost jobs. She proves this by noting Peter Garrett's endorsement of Professor Tim Flannery, a man who is on record as saying that "Ultimately there is only one set of accounts that matters at all. It's not what John Howard says or what the current account balance in the Australian economy is - it's the one held by the atmosphere".

From this Devine is able to extrapolate Flannery's motto, the core belief by which he is driven and by which he lives his life, and once again it seems we've all been taken for a ride. Flannery's motto has nothing to do with rescuing humanity from the folly of its unremitting march toward cataclysm. No - we finally learn that "forget the economy, is Flannery's motto". Labor has painted itself into a corner. It seems that by "hitching its wagon to climate-change catastrophists" Labor is choosing to ignore a large body of scientific evidence from climate change sceptics, most notably The Fraser Institute, described by Devine as a 'Canadian thinktank'.

The implication against Labor is clear. By choosing to ignore the opinions of a body describing itself as a 'thinktank', Labor is preferring the opinions of bodies which are not thinktanks, and thus cannot lay claim to be thinkers.

Devine has, with powerful and brilliant logic, pointed out that by ignoring an independent thinktank whose noble mission statement is simply to advocate economic rationalism, free trade and deregulation, and which is so independent that it receives no government funding at all, instead relying on the generosity of such companies as logging giant MacMillan Bloedel Limited, Labor has shown itself to be entirely close-minded on the issue.

Having established the danger and ridiculousness of left-wing global warming alarmism, Devine comes to the only logical conclusion - that global warming is a conspiracy hatched by left-wing scientists and politicians to unite the world against an abstract and defeatable enemy. "Nice idea if it works" she concludes sarcastically and with clear contempt for the evil idea of uniting a world in which so many are Muslims who support terrorism.

Once again Devine's logic is as brilliant as it is infallible - any scientist who supports the notion of global warming as posing dramatic and imminent consequences is clearly biased since they don't support the Howard government and are thus left-wing. Since left-wing people like Muslims who like terrorists, this whole global warming thing must be little more than a ploy to divert the world's attention from its hatred of terrorists, thus ensuring that Al Gore will be elected President in 2008.

Miranda Devine will not only win a Walkley for this report, but probably a Nobel Prize for Science too. After the Royal Commission of course.

Turnbull v Garrett

2007-02-09T13:04:00.000+11:00

Summary of Debate between Malcolm Turnbull and Peter Garrett on The 7.30 Report, 08/02/2007.

Turnbull: We're saving the Murray-Darling.

Garrett: You can't save it properly without doing something about global warming.

Turnbull: You're being alarmist. There's no need to scare people.

Garrett: But global warming is real and Australia will be amongst the hardest hit nations. We need to do something dramatic right now.

Turnbull: There you go being alarmist again. No, we need to take a measured approach.

Garrett: What do you mean by measured approach? It seems to mean a slow approach.

Turnbull: No. It means a sensible approach. We're going to take a sensible approach.

Garrett: How sensible?

Turnbull: Very sensible.

Garrett: No, I mean what are you actually going to do about it?

Turnbull: I told you, we're going to take a measured approach.

Garrett: And what does that involve?

Turnbull: Well we can't be alarmist about this. Why do you Labor people want to go around scaring people? The Liberal Party want everyone to be relaxed and comfortable, which is why they vote for us. Maybe if you stopped scaring people they'd vote for you too.

Garrett: But people need to be worried about this, its the biggest problem facing the world today!

Turnbull: Bigger than terrorism?

Garrett: Well... yes.

Turnbull: You would say that. You're soft on terrorism.

Garrett: What?! No, look, we need to do something about this and we need to do it now.

Turnbull: Why do you hate the economy?

Garrett: Eh?

Turnbull: Clearly you must hate the Australian economy.

Garrett: But we can impose emissions restrictions and a carbon trading scheme which will stimulate business. That's a myth that environmentalism hurts the economy.

Turnbull: You just said you want to restrict business. Therefore you hate the economy. And can I just also say that you also love recessions and debt.

Garrett: You're not making any sense.

Turnbull: Yes I am, you just wouldn't understand because I'm talking about the economy and only a Liberal government can understand the economy.

Garrett: Look, we need to do something about global warming, and we need to do it now. We need to invest in renewable energy sources.

Turnbull: And where's the money for that going to come from?

Garrett: Well where's the money for your magic nuclear power stations going to come from?

Turnbull: From the economy. You wouldn't understand.

Garrett: China uses more renewable energy than we do.

Turnbull: Yes, but they pollute more than we do. There's no point in us doing anything about global warming if they're not going to.

Garrett: But China is saying the same thing about Australia and the US!

Turnbull: Well I don't think its helpful to go playing the blame game. Why do you want to put us at an economic disadvantage?

Garrett: We need to work together. We need to sign the Kyoto protocol for a start...

Turnbull: That's just a piece of paper.

Garrett: No its not, its a multi-lateral agreement...

Turnbull: Why are you so obsessed with a piece of paper?

Garrett: Why won't you sign it if its just a piece of paper?

Turnbull: Because its a piece of paper that will hurt the economy. People will lose their jobs. I would say to everyone at home that if you don't want to lose your job, don't vote Labor.

Garrett: You're the one scaring people with all this rubbish about losing jobs!

Turnbull: No, we're taking a measured approach. The economy, jobs... you wouldn't understand. Did I mention that we've pretty much got this saving the Murray thing sewn up?

Hicks not nice: Henderson

2007-02-02T17:13:00.000+11:00

Supporters of David Hicks were this week shocked by Gerard Henderson's revelation that in fact, David Hicks is not a nice person. Henderson's groundbreaking expose on Hicks draws heavily on research which led him to discover little-known footage of the Adelaide man's letters to his father. The footage has remained unseen for many months now, because it was broadcast in prime-time on the SBS network.

"I was stunned to hear of this" declared human rights campaigner Selma Ramos. "If I had known all this time that David Hicks once had a commitment to radical Islam and said some anti-semitic things, I'd never have got on board with this case."

Other campaigners have expressed similar disappointment. Stewart Barr, president of Amnesty International Australia told The Daily Worry "Look this really is heartbreaking, we feel lied to and betrayed. His dad told us he was a nice boy who'd done nothing wrong. I mean, we knew he'd met Osama Bin Laden, but it didn't click with us exactly what that meant until Henderson pointed out that Bin Laden doesn't 'mix with idiots who have made unfortunate career decisions'. David is obviously following the career-path he chose, so we should leave him to it."

Asked if Amnesty International would continue to campaign for Hicks, Barr replied "absolutely not. Amnesty only stands up for the rights of people who are nice, because yucky people deserve whatever they get."

Greens leader Bob Brown was similarly disillusioned. "The Greens completely support due process and the right of habeas corpus. We believe that people should be quickly tried under a fair and impartial judicial system and should not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment or extended periods of solitary confinement. But only if they're nice people."

Democrats senator Natasha Stott Despoja was likewise excusatory. "I'd just like to say thankyou to Gerard Henderson. If he hadn't pointed out that David Hicks had changed his name to Mohammed Dawood some years ago, I'd still be supporting him."

Asked whether she'd be offering the government an apology for her misguidedly persistent badgering over Hicks, Ms Stott Despoja replied "look, I don't subscribe to the black-armband view of history so I'm not going to go apologising for things which happened in the past."

Man runs out of space on iPod

2007-02-01T18:27:00.000+11:00

A twenty-six year old Sydney man today found himself unable to upload any more tracks to his 60gb iPod. Terry Anderson of Mortdale encountered the calamity whilst attempting to upload Shakira's 'Hips Don't Lie' to his black video iPod.

"I was shocked" he told The Daily Worry. "You just don't expect this kind of thing. I mean, I'd heard stories about it happening to other people, but you just don't expect that kind of thing here in Australia. Apple say that this thing holds fifteen-thousand songs, but I say that's rubbish. I haven't counted exactly, but I'm sure I probably had less than fourteen thousand on there. I've had to delete 'The Very Best of Plastic Bertrand' to make room for my new Anthony Calea album, its a disgrace."

Apple spokeswoman Jessica Allsop, when asked to comment, insisted "we only claim that the 60gb model holds 'up to' fifteen-thousand songs, the actual number depends on the size of each song. Plus he should have bought the 80gb model, the 60gb iPod is not designed to accommodate Plastic Bertrand - it says so in the End User License Agreement embedded on page forty-two of the multilingual manual inside the shrinkwrapped box."

Mark Henderson SC of Henderson & Birch believes Apple is guilty of a vast conspiracy. "Everybody, absolutely everybody on the entire planet is sick to death of Apple's weasel-worded hyperbole. Its a clear breach of the Trade Practices Act. Apple have engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct and should be persecuted at the Hague."

Steve Shields, spokesman for rival Creative Audio agreed. "Look, Apple have been inflating these figures for years, and something needs to be done about it. Their products are clearly inferior. I would say to people unhappy with Apple that they should try our new 60gb Zen model, which holds up to sixteen-thousand songs."

In the meantime Anderson says he'll just have to deal with a more limited selection of music during his train ride to Central each morning - "It takes six hours to get into the city these days. If the government won't fix the trains they could at least subsidise 80gb iPods."

New Blog

2007-01-24T18:41:00.000+11:00

Today I created this blog and moved some of the posts from my MySpace blog here. The MySpace blog archive is still available at http://blog.myspace.com/nathanworryaboutitlater - comments included. Its also a MySpace music account, so you can check out some of my new tracks (when I get around to uploading them).

I got a bit sick of the rigidity of the MySpace blog, particularly the fact that only MySpace friends could comment.

Debnam Blackballs Forbiddance

2007-01-24T18:24:00.000+11:00

NSW Opposition Leader Peter Debnam today made headlines with his visionary plan to ban the banning of the Australian flag. In a grubby attempt to win some cheap political points from this adroit plan the NSW Greens immediately retorted with a communist plan to ban the banning of bans on flags. The Young Liberals then responded with an intelligent plan to ban the banning of tobacco advertising, but determined that marijuana should remain banned, and the Green Party should also be banned for their plan to ban the bans on it. Still, in amongst all this rotten politicking shone clear the forward-thinking logic of a great and unifying alternative leader.

"Im not prepared to stand back and let our national flag be banned... It's just not on. Next they'll say we can't sing the national anthem at the football."

Our glorious anthem puts the fear of God into the hearts of the opposition. We don't want to run the risk of not being able to sing our great and rousing anthem at the footy, so whoever 'they' are, Debnam's plan to ban them makes sense.

Debnam also promised to end the iniquity between thousand year old sites housing irreplaceable ancient Aboriginal art and spiritually significant artefacts and relics, and plaques outside of RSL clubs. "If you desecrate an Aboriginal site the fine is $11,000; if you desecrate a war memorial it's $2200... That's wrong and we're going to change it."

Debnam stresssed that "as someone who served in the navy and served under the flag" he felt that the time had come for NSW to lend a helping hand to the rest of the nation, and for us to join our fellow man in making a stand to protect the motherland. Debnam wants you as a new recruit.

Debnam's proposal for a national symbols bill includes the following:

- The flag should not be subjected to indignity or displayed below any other, because it is better than any other flag.
- It should not be allowed to fall or lie upon the ground, punishable by public flogging.
- It should not cover a statue, monument or plaque, or be used as a table or seat cover, but can be used as a cape, bandanna, dress, picnic rug or call to arms at music festivals.
- When the flag is raised or lowered, or carried in a parade or review, all present should face it, to make sure nobody steals it. Men should remove their hats and all should remain silent, because the flag hates hats and noise.
- Those who refuse to kiss the flag on request should have the shit kicked out of them by skinheads.

The Flag Thing

2007-01-23T18:27:00.000+11:00

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/ban-big-day-out-not-flag/2007/01/22/1169330794734.html

Warning: The Following commentary does not contain satire, or any of the devices thereof, including, but not limited to, hyperbole, irony, mockery, selection of detail, juxtaposition, euphemism, litotes or any form of understatement. Anyone with a history of aversion to serious comment should consult their doctor before ingesting this article. In the event of offence or outrage, induce vomiting.

The Big Day Out organisers have made a perfectly reasonable policy decision to discourage the exhibition of Australian flags at the Sydney leg of the festival in an attempt to avoid ethnic violence. So obviously the Telegraph and every politician under the sun feels the need to jump in with their two-cents worth in an attempt to score some free points with the proletariat - what a disgraceful bunch of opportunists. What was the Premier's response to this announcement? Thoughtful contemplation of the complex issues surrounding our national identity? Musings on the multi-faceted significance of the flag as a symbol of nationhood? Perhaps an expression of sorrow and a sincere apology that his government has not done more to douse the flames of bigotry in this state? Of course not, his response was as boring as it was predictable. He expressed 'outrage', a thoughtless, meaningless, knee-jerk response to a serious issue, proving just how unimaginative and intellectually bankrupt Australian politics has become.

There have been plenty of occassions where I've decked myself in green and gold and cloaked myself proudly in a gigantic Australian flag, but the BDO doesn't seem like the time or place, especially since its not an Australia Day event this year. The fact of the matter is that the Australian flag is used to incite ethnic hatred and violence. The politicians clamouring to express their disgust at this decision will be the first to point the finger at anyone who isn't white when the violence starts - we already know that Peter Debnam, our alternative NSW Premier, wouldn't mind seeing a few Muslim youths 'rounded up' and summarily punished. We can't keep dismissing violent racist white people as 'hooligans' every time this sort of thing goes down - at some stage it comes time to ponder whether perhaps there are more racist whiteys than we'd like to admit. But hey, in the meantime lets just throw shit at anyone brave enough to fess up to the blinding reality and bring these issues to the fore.

Displays of the flag must be put in proper context. At a cricket match such exhibits declare, "we're Australian and we're going to beat you". In Cronulla they suggest "we're Australian and we're going to beat you up". Anyone who insists that the flag is a 'symbol of unity' should pull their heads from their arses - its got the Union Jack in the corner, a symbol of Anglo pride if ever there was one. Since when did we become so nationalistic? At what stage did we become so convinced of our superiority? We're supposed to come "from all the lands on Earth", yet it seems that no refugee can join the club without a lengthy hazing in prison first. Are we supposed to feel some surge of patriotism this week as we reflect on these things? Or do we just forget about all the negative shit for a while and pretend everything is alright? The last thing I'll be wearing on Friday is an Australian flag. 219 years since invasion doesn't seem like such a great thing to celebrate. I don't think David Hicks will be celebrating either.

Field Day 2007

2007-01-09T18:29:00.000+11:00

An article I wrote for Tranzfusion. My journalistic integrity is for sale any time, all it takes is free vip tickets.

http://www.tranzfusion.com/articles/shownews.asp?newsid=6139

Aussie Values Study Guide

2006-12-29T18:30:00.000+11:00

The government's new citizenship test ensures that all Australians, except those born here, have an appreciation of those things which make us uniquely Australian. Behind 'staying the course', this policy is quite probably Howard's most ingenious yet, because it solves every problem we've ever had with ethnic integration in this country. You see, the problem has always been that despite the best efforts of Australians to make new Australians feel at home, new Australians obstinately insist upon their right to be different. For example, many have the audacity to speak with accents, or even pray to strange gods, which makes proper Australians feel uncomfortable. When we feel uncomfortable, we can't help feeling hostile toward that which is making us uncomfortable. If an itch was making you uncomfortable, you would scratch it. The most accurate way to think of the famous riots of Cronulla is as a good, vigorous scratch.

To help prospective candidates for the position of 'New Australian', I have prepared a brief study guide covering the central aspects of being 'true blue'. Be aware that you will need to practise the material covered in everyday life, and much of it may be incompatible with your own strange and/or weird foreign ways.

Mateship

Mateship is a secular religion in Australia stemming from the centuries old practice of referring to people whose name you have forgotten as 'mate'. It stands for everything that is Australian - getting pissed with your mates, helping out a mate, looking out for a mate, and having your mates around for a 'barbie'. (See 'barbie' under 'Food'). Contrary to popular belief, there is no synonym for the word 'mate'. Mateship is not 'friendship', since 'friendship' implies a kind of emotional attachment, which is of course a completely homo and/or feminine sentiment. There is nothing girly about mateship. It is a white heterosexual male concept and thus transcends all relevant racial and cultural boundaries.

Example usage:

- "Listen mate, I'm gonna need you to sign this AWA."
- "Sorry 'bout the wait mate, but they promise they'll have these military commisions up and running any month now."

Language

The official language of Australia is Australian. You will be expected to be able to speak it. And write it too, even if you happen to be dislexic or illiterate in your native language. You will be expected to speak Australian when communicating in public, since your native tongue makes real Australians feel uncomfortable. If you happen to cause a riot by making members of a white upper-middle class suburb fear that you are speaking in a foreign language about the many ways you plan to desecrate their freshly mown lawn, you will be expected to apologise to the local RSL club.

Food

Australian cuisine is world renowned for its vibrant use of condiments and subtle lack of spices. The most famous Australian meal is the barbecue, or 'barbie'. The barbie is an outdoor cooking plate used to fry sausages, steak and mince-patties. Claims that it can also be used to grill eggplant are yet to be verified. Australians are also big fans of foreign cuisine, regularly indulging in such exotic dishes as Sweet & Sour Pork, Dim Sims and Butter Chicken. The recent trend toward modern 'cultural fusion' dishes is therefore quite unsurprising. One favourite is Spring Rolls dipped in Heinz tomato sauce.

Ethics

Not to be confused with 'ethnics', ethics are actually a positive force in Australian society. Some examples that new Australians may not be aware of include our disdain for human sacrifices, our disapproval toward Germaine Greer, our frowning upon marriage between siblings, our disgust at racism, and our hatred of South Africans (but only the white ones).

We will not tolerate violence against women when they don't deserve it, and are especially vigilant toward any instances of sexual assault involving multiple assailants, or 'ethnic gangs' as we call them.

Religion

The constitution of Australia reads "Whereas the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth". It is of particular note that the constitutional preamble does not refer to Allah. Nevertheless, Australians, despite being under no obligation to do so, have kindly opened their doors to foreigners of all lands, and with great generosity allowed them to practice whichever religion they choose. Australians are especially fond of touchy-feely religions which promote meditation and whose holy figures make tremendous hand-carved holiday souvenirs and incense holders. They are thoroughly disapproving however of any religion which promotes hatred and intolerance, but like Christianity because Christmas and Easter are fun. Australians believe that it is important to tolerate all religions, however much their mosques devalue the local property market. Australians are maliciously contemptuous of Tom Cruise and all his Scientology disciples, whose religion encourages heartbreak upon our Nic.

Sport

More important than religion in Australia is sport. Sport crosses cultural boundaries, and is thus infinitely more effective that the UN in cementing friendly ties with other nations, even the uncivilized ones. For example, every couple of years we play test cricket against Pakistan because, try as they might, the United States just aren't very good at cricket. You will be expected to paint your face green and gold for the duration of every Olympic Games and World Cup, and stop supporting the country of your birth immediately. Australians do not like new Australians who do not share their fervent passion for Australia's sporting success.

Government

Australia enjoys a democratic system of government run by John Howard, the greatest Prime Minister Australia has ever had. You will be expected, as a true Australian, to vote Liberal. Failure to vote Liberal will lead to interest rates as high as 87%. It is a well-established fact that Labor kills babies at the behest of the Unions.

Aborigines

Aborigines are the native people of this country. They are good at throwing boomerangs and playing didgeridoos. In 1788 they were rescued from savagery by European settlement. Aborigines like to get drunk with Justice Michael Kirby at gay bars and make up devious lies in an attempt to steal people's land. If it weren't for John Howard, Australia would be entirely owned by Aborigines, who would force us to pay them eleventy-billion dollars in welfare every day.

Welfare

In the spirit of 'a fair go', Australia's welfare system is being slowly dismantled. This will ensure that all Australians who aren't bludgers will be given a fair go at not paying for students to learn about Communism or for Aborigines to buy food, medical supplies and petrol to sniff. This money will instead be redirected, with stay-at-home mums given a fair go at not having to do men's jobs and drought-stricken farmers a fair go at coaxing another crop out of their untillable land some time in the next six years.

Travel

Australians have a proud tradition of overseas travel. Most young Australians will spend several months globe trotting through Europe, South-East Asia and North America, because these are the safest and easiest parts of the world in which to get pissed and desecrate hallowed relics.

There are many theories as to why Australians feel such a pressing urge to see the world, but the most likely is that there is no greater pleasure for a true blue Aussie than to visit inferior nations in order to assert one's superiority over them. A real Australian can think of few dandier delights than getting hammered in a Bangkok strip-club with his mates and making fun of the taxi driver's funny accent on the way back to the Novotel.

ANZACS

ANZAC is an acronym standing for Australia New Zealand Army Corps. But ANZAC is more than the sum of its parts. In Australia it is a kind of spiritual force, best typified by Simpson and his donkey. Simpson was a stretcher bearer at Gallipolli, a strip of sand in Turkey where thousands of Australians were killed in glorious defeat thanks to the incompetence of the Poms, who have since been duly punished on the cricket field. Any suggestions that Simpson was an illegal immigrant, socialist, unionist and army deserter are lies spread by un-Australian Black Armband historians who hate freedom.

Charlie at Twelve O'Clock

2006-11-29T18:31:00.000+11:00

You spot something out of the corner of your eye. A flash of colour, a shrill voice, in any other context benign, today spells danger. Real danger. This could get ugly. You know what needs to be done. Stooping a little you slowly begin to veer away from the menace. If you can just stay out of their line of sight you might get lucky. Something might distract them. You could make a dash for safety. A sense of imminent doom permeates your very being. Past experience dictates that this is going to end horribly. You've been spotted. It's time to move, and move you do. Your step quickens, pack beating against your back to the rhythm of your step. You stumble, recover, he's moving in on you.

Suddenly you swerve, changing course in the hope of throwing him off. Momentarily taken aback by such a bold move the enemy reassesses before plotting a new course to cut you off at the pass. This isn't going well, you knew you shouldn't have taken such an obvious route, what a fool you've been! For the sake of saving a couple of minutes you've exposed yourself. Cold, vulnerable, out in the open, waiting to be picked off like a lame antelope.

'Not today', you resolve.
'You can get me tomorrow, but today is my day.'

Courage is a strange beast. It seems to desert us at the most irritating moments. When you're about to unleash your skateboard down a four metre high ramp, or put your hand up for a penalty kick, or talk to that beautiful young something at the bar. But when courage is truly called for, that's when the men are sorted from the boys. Your courage doesn't desert you today.

You change direction, feigning a direct retreat before spinning 180 degrees to charge the foe head on. Darting left and right and left again you know you have him confused. This is it, the moment of truth. At the instant of impact you pirouette past your adversary and make your dash to freedom. All the defeated combatant can do is stare in disbelief as you make your getaway.

Emboldened by your stunning victory you charge gleefully on, drunk on triumph, entirely assured of you own greatness. Today is your day and life is looking up. It'll be cigars and margaritas tonight baby.

Then you hear it. You should have known he'd call for reinforcements, how could you be so reckless? Words to send chills down the spine of any urban warrior. A friendly hand cast menacingly toward you.

"Hello, have you got a minute to spare for homeless diabetic whale cancer research?" Clutching protectively at the wallet containing your credit card you think, "this really is the last time I walk through Martin Place at lunch..."

How to tell if you're a handwringing pinko leftie do-gooder.

2006-11-16T18:33:00.000+11:00

These guys are totally sick for tofu
and Che Guevara T-Shirts.

As an exercise in self-analysis I have identified fifteen surefire signs that you are in fact, bourgeois trash. The truth is often a bitter pill to swallow, but if we can't laugh at ourselves, who can we laugh at? George Bush is always a safe bet. And the survey says...

- Anyone who claims to be 'de-toxing'. You cannot cleanse your liver or heal your body in just three weeks. It really doesn't work like that.

- Anyone who drinks Soy Lattes. Everyone knows they taste like absolute s#it, so why put yourself through it?

- Use of the word 'fascist' as a synonym for 'conservative' or 'right-wing'.

- Emailing friends political articles from the Herald with the subject header:
['Alan Ramsey explains why Howard is going to lose the next election.']

- Anyone who, like me, thinks that owning two Scissor Sisters albums makes them outrageously cool.

- Anyone who claims to be a 'proper bisexual' but has never had a partner of the same sex.

- Any man who moisturises his hands.

- Any wealthy parent who chooses to support public education by sending their child to a state primary school, then sends them to Cranbrook or Knox for high school.

- Anyone who insists on adding 'and the locals were so poor, but they kept smiling' to every second sentence describing their recent overseas holiday.

- People who believe that doing yoga in a 46 degree heated room does anything but make other people's farts smell worse.

- People who only eat organic and describe genetically modified food as 'Frankenstein food' *. These people are very difficult to cook for, and always embarrass you at cafes by insisting that their soy latte be made from non-genetically modified soybeans.

- The drinking of Aloe Vera Juice is a surefire sign that you are completely and utterly pink.

- People who preach religious tolerance, but make an exception for scientology.

- Anyone who writes Haikus.

- Anyone hoping for another interest rate rise before the next election.

- Anyone who thinks its just oh so vogue and postmodern to deride themselves and their own subculture on their blog is a filthy pinko left-wing intellectual elitist.

* No animal DNA is present, though GM food remains a complex issue. Environmentalists have convinced African leaders to reject millions of dollars worth of desperately needed grain donations. Such GM seeds are modified to better withstand the continent's often harsh and arid climates and harvest up to eight times more efficiently. On the one hand, Africans continue to starve as their governments play it safe. On the other, your body is your temple, even if it is a hungry temple. No seriously, there is a good argument to be made against GM food: http://www.greens.org/s-r/34/34-09.html.

All aboard the stabbetycopter

2006-11-15T18:32:00.000+11:00

Public outcry and moral indignation are two of my favourte things, so needless to say I've very much enjoyed the announcement of OJ Simpson's new book 'If I Did It'. Simpson, who still owes his former wife's family $44 million after being found responsible in civil proceedings for her death, has stumbled upon a neat way to make some cash - write a book about how he might have killed Nicole Brown Simpson. If he did it. You know, just hypothetically. Might have done it, might not have. Just gonna write a book about it, you know, throw a few ideas out there, stir the pot a bit, make millions of dollars out of murdering someone, that sort of thing. I'm not entirely sure why he'd bother with the whole 'if' masquerade though. Double jeopardy laws ensure that he's completely safe from a second prosecution and I'm pretty confident that 'Yup, I totally did it: and you'll never guess how!' would walk off the shelves.

I have managed to get my hands on some exclusive extracts of this book, and they make for very interesting reading. Here's just a few samples:

- "Say for example I walked in the front door, and she was like there, I like, might have just wanted to talk to her. We're not at the stabbing part yet, that comes later."

- "Maybe Ronald Goldman got in the way whilst trying to protect her. Maybe Ronald Goldman was sitting on the couch eating hot chips and patiently waiting for his turn. More likely he was first though - stabbing practice. That handsome nancy boy model could never take me on, I was the first player to ever run over 2000 yards in one season. Who da man?! Not Ronald Goldman, he's so dead from stab wounds."

- "I might not have been able to find a glove that fitted, so I might have just grabbed one that was a bit of a tight fit. It did the trick. I mean, it might have done the trick."

- "She might have struggled. Then again she might have liked it cause she might have thought it was totally kinky. Or maybe I'm just a filthy wife-beater. You'll never know. Except for that last bit."

- "Now this may come as a shock, but I actually shot her with a sawn-off shotgun... You believed me didn't you? Oh man, you been so Juiced..."

- "Alright, seriously, this is actually what might have happened. I might have stabbed her. Is that what you wanted to hear? There fine, I said it, I might have stabbed her. I hope you've all got closure now."

- "Lemon juice is ideal for adding a zesty tang to any salad. It also blinds people when you squirt it in their eyes, making them more susceptible to a good old fashioned stabbin'. I love that word. 'Stab'. If you say it twenty times fast, it sounds like a helicopter!"

- "Speaking of helicopters, a couple might have followed me as I fled the scene. I was driving along, and I'm like, 'damn, what's that noise, it sounds like someone saying stab stab stab stab...'"

- "I might have got in my white Ford Bronco to flee the murder scene. Or I might have been at home watching re-runs of The Man from U.N.C.L.E. That's a funny show. I might have enjoyed that."

- "The Ford Bronco might have been brown. I came so close to getting the brown one, it was actually the dealer who talked me out of it. He said 'OJ, you're wife is white, you should get a white car.' In hindsight I should have got the brown one. That guy's logic was so flawed."

As Naomi Robson would say, "hmmm, it really makes you think." What a strange thing for someone who's clearly incapable of thinking for herself to say. As Ray Martin would say, "I'm Ray Martin, have a great evening, hope you enjoy your weekend, we'll see you back here on Monday. Goodnight." But he never came back, and Monday's just aren't the same. Stab it.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/people/ojs-revolting-confession/2006/11/16/1163266678010.html

Because sometimes you just hate people.

2006-10-29T17:33:00.000+11:00

"So, what have you been up to?" - Ten answers not to give.

- "Just hangin' round the park hunting stray domestic animals with a machete."

- "I've been working on my novel about a rapist clown. He likes to keep the nipples as souvenirs. Its a comedy."

- "I've been so busy trying to keep my boyfriend and girlfriend from finding out about each other."

- "Actually, I've gotten into the habit of lubricating my fingers and playing with my anus whilst I masturbate."

- "Sorry, I can't talk now, I've got a bus to catch. These backpacks don't detonate themselves you know!"

- "Campaigning to convince people of the virtues of WorkChoices."

- "Kiddy fiddling."

- "Since you ask, have you heard of Dianetics?"

- "Well I've got this new girlfriend who's totally into all that vampire shit..."

- "Just been chillin' with my mate Shannon. You know Shannon Noll? Yeah, he's like, my best mate now..."

Not the only man to get stabbed in the heart by something with flaps that smell like fish.

2006-10-24T16:34:00.000+10:00

A Tribute to Steve Irwin.

Steve, though you were always a source of cheap laughs and amusement for my friends and I, we do genuinely miss you. Its always sad when a guy who brings smiles passes. And its always sad when someone you can truly identify with leaves us. But most of all I'm pissed off that I can't do my stellar impersonation of you anymore.

Steve, in you we saw so much of the quintessential Australian. In fact, I see myself as quite the quintessential Australian - we shared so many traits I feel as though a part of me has died with you. For example:

- Our unwavering confidence in our own taste in clothing.You wore Khaki everywhere, and I wear a suit Monday through Friday. My favourite shirt is the iridescent pink one. I like to couple it with a cerise and blue tie.

- You wrestled crocodiles with nothing but a rope and some gaffer-tape. I once caught a hairy spider with a glass. It was huuuuuuge!

- You were a fierce and active supporter of environmental conservation. I once voted for the Greens at a council election. Clearly we're both willing to make sacrifices for the planet.

- By all accounts you always went out of your way to speak to people you didn't have to and to make your colleagues feel like part of the family. I always go out of my way to speak to girls in nightclubs and invite them to start a family with me. Or at least meet my mum.

- You had blonde hair. I have blonde hair. I get it done by a guy named Roderigo at a boutique Salon in Surry Hills. I just don't trust anybody else.

- For you, nothing came close to camping out in the rugged outdoors. This must be in an Australian's blood, because I usually sleep with the window open in summer. In fact I'm so passionate about this that I just got a fly-screen put up to keep the insects out.

- When it came to dangerous reptiles, you believed in giving infant children the same baptism of fire you got from your dad. I also believe in scaring the crap out of babies for the amusement of others. If it was good enough for me to be put in a suitcase by my dad and thrown down the stairs to the cheers of fourteen drunk middle-aged cricket fans, its good enough for anyone else who isn't old enough to support their own head.

- You ran your own successful multi-million dollar enterprise. I also have ingrained in me the business acumen of five generations of white-Australia. I like to buy things off ebay, then sell them two months later at a profit.

- You were always striving to open people's eyes to the beauty of the wonderful fauna this great nation is blessed with. I too am always trying to convince my friends that my cat really is very friendly when you get to know her. You just have to get past the scratching and the furballs and allergens.

So you see Steve, you and I aren't so different, and if you're what it means to be Australian, I'm damn proud to call myself orrrstrayan.